Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41489047›Full record

ArticleGerodontology2026

Co-Existence of Divergent Oral Care Approaches in Danish Aged Care: A Qualitative Study.

Linnea Eisemann de Almeida, Louise Folker, Christina Andersen, Astrid Pernille Jespersen, Esben Boeskov Øzhayat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gerodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linnea Eisemann de AlmeidaResearch Section for Oral Health, Society, and Technology, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2962-0038
Louise FolkerResearch Section for Oral Health, Society, and Technology, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5885-686X
Christina AndersenResearch Section for Oral Health, Society, and Technology, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1813-5088
Astrid Pernille JespersenCopenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities (CoRe), Saxo Institute, Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Esben Boeskov ØzhayatResearch Section for Oral Health, Society, and Technology, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8656-0292

Funding

Sygeforsikring "danmark" 2020-0343Velux Fonden 00040212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCare approaches to oral health are shaped by the perspectives of both aged care and dental care professionals. This study provides a new and comprehensive understanding of how these two professional groups conceptualise and address oral care for care-dependent older adults. MATERIAL AND

methodsResearchers conducted 13 focus group discussions with 4-6 participants each in two Danish municipalities within the Lifelong Oral Health research project: nine with aged care staff and four with managers from aged care and dental care. Two semi-structured interviews were conducted with dental care staff. The research was guided by a qualitative methodological framework using inductive thematic analysis to explore participants' experiences and perspectives.

resultsAged care and dental care staff held varying perspectives on four distinct care approaches: (1) knowledge of oral health; (2) prioritisation of oral health; (3) care practice in relation to oral health; (4) handling refusal of oral care. In contrast to dental care staff, aged care staff had rudimentary oral health knowledge and prioritised other care tasks over oral care. Aged care staff took a rehabilitative approach to oral care, whereas dental care staff favoured a compensatory approach. Aged care staff stated that the right to self-determination overruled the duty of care presented by dental care staff when patients refused oral care. These differences affected daily oral care practices and collaboration between both staff groups, who both endorsed better collaboration.

conclusionDivergent care approaches to oral care between aged care and dental care staff can hinder good oral health in care-dependent older adults. To enhance oral health in older adults, this article identifies four divergent approaches and explores how they challenge inter-professional collaboration.

Indexed as

Dental Care for AgedAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelDenmarkFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOral HealthQualitative Researchaged caredental careinterdisciplinary collaborationolder adultsoral healthqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID41489047
PMCPMC13139989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.