ArticleAnnals of neurology2026
Does Missing Medication Acutely Change Seizure Risk? A Prospective Study.
Article in Annals of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine whether missing individual doses of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) elevate short-term seizure risk in people with drug-resistant epilepsy.
methodsIn a prospective, community-based cohort, adults with drug-resistant epilepsy (≥ 3 seizures/month) or their caregivers recorded seizures and ASM intake with smartphone applications for 10 months each. Individual level analysis modeled the relationships between ASM adherence with seizure occurrence, as well as with a simplified seizure forecast via a 90-day moving average ("Napkin method"). Group-level analysis with a mixed-effects model was performed to examine the relationship between ASM adherence and simplified forecasts, while controlling for differences in individual seizure frequency via random effects.
resultsTwenty-seven participants (median age = 29 years) contributed 7,853 person-days. Individual analysis showed that only a small (n = 2) number of participants had a weak relationship between ASM adherence with seizure occurrence. Group-level analysis showed that seizure occurrence was highly linked to the Napkin method, but not ASM adherence.
interpretationAmong individuals with frequent, drug-resistant epilepsy, occasional missed ASM doses did not measurably raise immediate seizure risk. Whereas sustained nonadherence remains a clinical concern, clinicians may reassure patients that infrequent brief lapses are unlikely to trigger seizures acutely, yet they should continue emphasizing overall adherence for long-term seizure control. ANN NEUROL 2026;99:1076-1082.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.