ArticlePhysiologia plantarum
Machine Learning Approaches to Assess Soil Microbiome Dynamics and Bio-Sustainability.
Article in Physiologia plantarum. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Plant-Associated Soil Microbiomes for Sustainable and Climate-Resilient Agriculture: Mechanisms, Technologies, and Applications.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Harnessing the plant microbiome: innovation towards sustainable agriculture and ecological resilience.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Review
- Harnessing plant microbiomes to enhance crop resilience and restore war-affected soils in Ukraine.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Next-generation soil monitoring: linking metagenomics, biosensors, and ecological modeling for sustainable agriculture.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Approaches to Assess Soil Microbiome Dynamics and Bio-Sustainability.Physiologia plantarumArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding soil microbiota dynamics is essential for enhancing bio-sustainability in agriculture, yet the complexity of microbial communities hampers the prediction of their functional roles. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer powerful tools to analyse high-dimensional microbiome data generated by high-throughput sequencing. Here, we apply unsupervised AI-based algorithms to uncover microbial patterns that are not immediately recognisable but are crucial for characterising the biological status of agricultural soils. Soil samples were collected from a site in Northern Italy managed under four strategies: conventional farming without organic matter (C), with organic matter (C + O), with beneficial microorganisms but without organic matter (M), and with both beneficial microorganisms and organic matter (M + O). Metagenomic amplicon sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region was used to profile bacterial and fungal communities. Principal component analysis (PCA), k-means clustering, and t-distributed stochastic neighbour embedding (t-SNE) revealed coherent temporal trajectories in both datasets, with sampling time and crop presence emerging as dominant drivers of community assembly and only subtle compositional shifts attributable to treatments. Fungal communities exhibited higher plasticity and a stronger response to management than bacterial communities, which converged towards a stable oligotrophic core. Our findings highlight the complementary roles of fungal and bacterial guilds and show that unsupervised ML-based workflows provide an effective framework to disentangle temporal and treatment effects in complex microbiome datasets. This exploratory study lays the groundwork for future predictive models aimed at identifying microbial indicators of soil biological status and supporting bio-sustainable agronomic decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.