Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41489025›Full record

ArticlePhysiologia plantarum

Machine Learning Approaches to Assess Soil Microbiome Dynamics and Bio-Sustainability.

Roberta Pace, Maurilia M Monti, Salvatore Cuomo, Antonio Affinito, Michelina Ruocco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiologia plantarum. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roberta PaceDepartment of Biology, University of the Study of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0475-6238
Maurilia M MontiInstitute of Sustainable Plant Protection of the National Research Council (IPSP-CNR)-Portici, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4508-7106
Salvatore CuomoDepartment of Mathematics and Applications "Renato Caccioppoli", University of the Study of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Antonio AffinitoEVJA s.r.l., Naples, Italy.
Michelina RuoccoInstitute of Sustainable Plant Protection of the National Research Council (IPSP-CNR)-Portici, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding soil microbiota dynamics is essential for enhancing bio-sustainability in agriculture, yet the complexity of microbial communities hampers the prediction of their functional roles. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer powerful tools to analyse high-dimensional microbiome data generated by high-throughput sequencing. Here, we apply unsupervised AI-based algorithms to uncover microbial patterns that are not immediately recognisable but are crucial for characterising the biological status of agricultural soils. Soil samples were collected from a site in Northern Italy managed under four strategies: conventional farming without organic matter (C), with organic matter (C + O), with beneficial microorganisms but without organic matter (M), and with both beneficial microorganisms and organic matter (M + O). Metagenomic amplicon sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region was used to profile bacterial and fungal communities. Principal component analysis (PCA), k-means clustering, and t-distributed stochastic neighbour embedding (t-SNE) revealed coherent temporal trajectories in both datasets, with sampling time and crop presence emerging as dominant drivers of community assembly and only subtle compositional shifts attributable to treatments. Fungal communities exhibited higher plasticity and a stronger response to management than bacterial communities, which converged towards a stable oligotrophic core. Our findings highlight the complementary roles of fungal and bacterial guilds and show that unsupervised ML-based workflows provide an effective framework to disentangle temporal and treatment effects in complex microbiome datasets. This exploratory study lays the groundwork for future predictive models aimed at identifying microbial indicators of soil biological status and supporting bio-sustainable agronomic decisions.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyAgricultureBacteriaFungiPrincipal Component AnalysisRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilbio‐sustainbabilityhigh‐throughput sequencingmachine learning (ML)metagenomicssoil microbiota

Identifiers

PMID41489025
PMCPMC12766673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.