ArticleEuropean journal of haematology2026
Efficacy and Safety of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Patients.
Article in European journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Donor lymphocyte infusion as immune modulation after pediatric allogeneic transplantation.Blood immunology & cellular therapy · 2026Article
- Current and emerging maintenance strategies after stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents with acute leukemias.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy and safety of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children. We describe the long-term use of preemptive, prophylactic, and therapeutic DLI with a gradual dose increase in half-log increments. Under close monitoring, we increased the DLI dose only in patients that did not show signs of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In the preemptive cohort, 10 of 12 patients (83%) with minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity remained relapse-free. Among 11 patients with genetic diseases and mixed chimerism, nine (82%) responded to preemptive DLI. Six patients (100%) of the prophylactic cohort with a very high risk of relapse had a successful outcome without relapse or GVHD. Three of the five patients (60%) of the therapeutic cohort were successfully treated with DLI. We observed acute GVHD (grade I and II) in only two patients (6%). The results of our study indicate that the long-term use of DLI is a promising strategy and can effectively prevent relapse, graft rejection, and even cure relapse. The observed low rate of GVHD may be attributed to the gradual dose increase. Therefore, we consider DLI a safe and effective therapeutic option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.