ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Effects of living environment quality on cultural heritage responsibility behaviors of residents in traditional villages: a case study from Hangzhou, China.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Based on the PAD temperament model, this study aims to systematically reveal the influence path of living environment quality in traditional villages on residents' cultural heritage responsibility behaviors, and verify the individual mediating effects and sequential mediating effect of place attachment and pride, so as to provide empirical support for the theoretical system of cultural heritage protection. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted among 425 residents from 4 traditional villages in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China to collect data. Core variables were measured using mature scales, and the reliability and validity of the scales were tested through a pilot survey (Cronbach's Results: Living environment quality had no direct significant impact on cultural heritage responsibility behaviors ( Conclusion: This study expands the application boundary of the PAD model in the field of cultural heritage protection in traditional villages, and clarifies the sequential mediating mechanism of "living environment quality → place attachment → pride → cultural heritage responsibility behaviors". The research conclusions provide a scientific basis for the protection practice of traditional villages, and can indirectly promote the sustainable inheritance of cultural heritage by optimizing the living environment and cultivating residents' emotional identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.