ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Increased work of breathing and its relationship to dyspnea in malignant pleural effusion.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Although dyspnea is the most common symptom of pleural effusion (PE), its physiological basis has not yet been fully elucidated. The aim of this work is to investigate the cause of dyspnea before therapeutic thoracentesis (TT) by analyzing the lack of dyspnea relief after TT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data gathered during TT. Among others, our database includes measurements of instantaneous pleural pressure (Ppl) in the ipsilateral hemithorax and airflow in the mouth (during TT), as well as arterial gas tensions (AGT) and dyspnea characterized quantitatively via the Modified Borg Scale (before and after TT). As the Borg scale is a subjective measure, the change in dyspnea (dB) was used in reliable quantitative analyses. Differences in various parameters and their changes between patients who reported dyspnea relief and the other patients (the YES and NO groups, respectively) were studied. Additionally, correlations between dB and these parameters (and their changes) were studied. Results: Only the amplitude of Ppl changes related to breathing after TT was significantly different (higher) in group NO than in group YES (p < 0.003; the large effect size). dB correlated with this amplitude and the volume of withdrawn fluid (r = -0.51 and 0.51, respectively), but it correlated with neither changes in AGT nor minute ventilation. Conclusion: The results suggest that the key mechanism of dyspnea in patients with malignant PE is related to reduced total lung compliance due to collapse of a lung part, leading to an increase in the work of breathing required to maintain adequate minute ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.