Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41488897›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia relapse and prognosis: key predictors and therapeutic implications.

XiaoYan Chen, LingLing Wu, CaiYun Kuang, JiaYi Wang, WenGe Hao, Hua Jiang, WeiNa Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

XiaoYan ChenDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
LingLing WuDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
CaiYun KuangDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
JiaYi WangDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
WenGe HaoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hua JiangDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
WeiNa ZhangDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most common childhood malignancy, achieves >95% 5-year survival with risk-adapted therapies. Nonetheless, 10%-15% of patients experience relapse, with post-relapse survival <50%. Challenges remain in optimizing minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided strategies and salvage therapies in ALL. Aims: This study aimed to identify relapse predictors and assess post-relapse outcomes among 436 pediatric ALL patients treated according to the CCCG-ALL-2015 protocol. Results: Of the 436 enrolled patients (median age: 3.9 years; 92.4% B-ALL), sixty-four patients (14.7%) relapsed, predominantly with isolated bone marrow involvement (71.9%). Independent predictors included thrombocytopenia at diagnosis (OR = 2.09, Conclusion: Thrombocytopenia at diagnosis,

Indexed as

acute lymphoblastic leukemiaimmunothearpypediatricprognosisrelapse

Identifiers

PMID41488897
PMCPMC12756419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.