ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026
Deep Learning Model for Predicting Operative Mortality After Total Gastrectomy: Analysis of the Japanese National Clinical Database (NCD).
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of the Novel G-CMAP Score: A Preoperative Scoring System for Predicting Postoperative Complications After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Response to 'Further Detail Concerning the Deep Learning Model for Mortality After Total Gastrectomy'.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Which Method Best Predicts Postoperative Complications: Deep Learning, Machine Learning, or Conventional Logistic Regression?Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
- Further Detail Concerning the Deep Learning Model for Mortality After Total Gastrectomy.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is the primary treatment for gastric cancer. However, the overall complication rate remains approximately 10%-20%, with a postoperative mortality rate of 2.3%. Therefore, preoperative stratification of patients based on their expected surgical risks is important. This study aimed to develop a deep learning prediction model using big data from the National Clinical Database (NCD) to predict operative mortality after total gastrectomy. Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer and were registered in the NCD between January 2018 and December 2019 were included. A total of 62 variables, including age, sex, past medical history, preoperative blood test results, and tumor characteristics, were used as covariates, with operative mortality as the outcome variable. Deep learning models were developed using Python, TensorFlow and Keras. Hyperparameters were adjusted using the k-fold method with the training data. The model was evaluated using validation data. Results: Of the 14 980 eligible cases, 11 980 were used for training and 3000 for validation. The event rate was 1.2%. A four-layer, 5217-variable model was developed. The final C-statistic was 0.79 (95% confidence intervals: 0.74-0.83) for the training data and 0.74 (95% confidence intervals: 0.62-0.85) for the validation data. Conclusion: We developed a deep learning model to predict operative mortality using big data from the NCD. To improve the accuracy, it is necessary to introduce new variables related to postoperative complications or factors that cannot be analyzed using conventional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.