Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41488846›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026

Development of a Scoring System to Predict the Treatment Success for Nonoperative Management of Peptic Ulcer Perforation: A Secondary Data Analysis of PPAP Study.

Kei Ito, Akira Endo, Hiromasa Hoshi, Koji Ito, Tomohiro Akutsu, Hikaru Odera, Hideto Shiraki, Takeshi Yokoyama, Yasukazu Narita, Taro Masuda and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kei ItoDepartment of Acute Care Surgery Fujisawa City Hospital Fujisawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3994-8478
Akira EndoDepartment of Acute Critical Care Medicine Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital Tsuchiura Japan.
Hiromasa HoshiDepartment of Acute Critical Care Medicine Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital Tsuchiura Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7402-8274
Koji ItoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital Tsuchiura Japan.
Tomohiro AkutsuDepartment of Acute Critical Care Medicine Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital Tsuchiura Japan.
Hikaru OderaDepartment of Acute Critical Care and Disaster Medicine Institute of Science Tokyo Meguro Japan.
Hideto ShirakiDepartment of Surgery Chiba Rosai Hospital Chiba Japan.
Takeshi YokoyamaDepartment of Surgery Ohtanishinouchi General Hospital Koriyama Japan.
Yasukazu NaritaDepartment of Surgery Mito Medical Center Higashiibaraki Japan.
Taro MasudaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Center Matsudo City General Hospital Matsudo Japan.
Akira SuekaneDepartment of Acute Critical Care and Disaster Medicine Institute of Science Tokyo Meguro Japan.
Shigeru YamagishiDepartment of Surgery Fujisawa City Hospital Fujisawa Japan.
Koji MorishitaDepartment of Acute Critical Care and Disaster Medicine Institute of Science Tokyo Meguro Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although surgical treatment is the primary measure for patients with perforated peptic ulcer (PPU), nonoperative management (NOM) has become a common alternative. However, risk score models predicting the success of NOM based on the analysis of a large number of patients remain scarce. We developed a clinically applicable scoring system to predict the success of NOM in patients with PPU using data from a large cohort. Method: We analyzed data of the Perforated Peptic ulcer Analyzing Project (PPAP), which was a retrospective survey of adult patients with PPU between January 2011 to December 2022. The successful NOM case was defined as patients who survived until hospital discharge without requiring surgery. Factors associated with NOM were identified using a multivariable logistic regression analysis, and a scoring system to predict NOM was developed by weighting these factors based on the regression coefficients. Result: Of 702 potentially eligible patients, 584 were treated with NOM, of which 130 patients (22.2%) were treated successfully. Age, sex, body temperature, heart rate, the extent of peritoneal irritation signs, C reactive protein, spread of ascites, and sepsis were included in the final model. Using these variables, we developed the scoring system named PPAP score, which had favorable discriminating ability with the area under receiving operating characteristic curve of 0.799. When the cut-off was set to 56, the sensitivity and the specificity were 0.738 and 0.722, respectively. Conclusion: A predictive scoring model was developed. However, external validation of the model is required to confirm its clinical applicability.

Indexed as

general surgerynonoperative managementpeptic ulcer perforation

Identifiers

PMID41488846
PMCPMC12757152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.