Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41488823›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research2025

Global Prevalence of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jhosmer Ballena-Caicedo, Lupita Ana Maria Valladolid-Sandoval, Fiorella E Zuzunaga-Montoya, Victor Juan Vera-Ponce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jhosmer Ballena-CaicedoFacultad de Medicina (FAMED), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodriguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Amazonas, Peru.
Lupita Ana Maria Valladolid-SandovalFacultad de Medicina (FAMED), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodriguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Amazonas, Peru.
Fiorella E Zuzunaga-MontoyaFacultad de Medicina (FAMED), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodriguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Amazonas, Peru.
Victor Juan Vera-PonceFacultad de Medicina (FAMED), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodriguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Amazonas, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain and alterations in bowel habits. Previous studies show variability in its prevalence according to region and diagnostic criteria used. The objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the global prevalence of IBS, considering studies that used Rome III and IV criteria. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scielo through March 2024. Observational studies reporting IBS prevalence using Rome III or IV criteria were included. Studies in specific populations, conference abstracts, and gray literature were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using Munn's tool for prevalence studies. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, subgroup analyses by probabilistic sampling, meta-regressions by year, and publication bias assessment through funnel plots. Results: Forty-three studies (26 Rome III, 17 Rome IV) with 188,885 participants were included. The global prevalence was 13.21% (95% confidence interval (CI): 10.70-15.94%) with Rome III and 17.14% (95% CI: 12.00-22.99%) with Rome IV. When considering only studies with probabilistic sampling, prevalences adjusted to 11.19% and 13.28%, respectively. Higher prevalence was found in women (Rome III: 15.69% vs. 11.10% in men; Rome IV: 20.17% vs. 11.45%). Meta-regression showed a trend toward increased prevalence in recent years. Conclusion: Rome IV showed a higher prevalence than Rome III, possibly due to a more precise definition of abdominal pain. The heterogeneity found suggests the need to standardize methodologies and conduct more studies with probabilistic sampling, especially in underrepresented regions.

Indexed as

Abdominal painFunctional bowel disordersIrritable bowel syndromeMeta-analysisPrevalenceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41488823
PMCPMC12758091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.