ArticleGastroenterology research2025
Global Prevalence of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Gastroenterology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal Bloating in the Modern Era: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Environmental Contributors.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Cholecystectomy and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3,511,681 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota signatures differentiate trajectory-defined response phenotypes and predict self-management outcomes in irritable bowel syndrome.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Dietary Behaviors, Digestive Symptoms, and Neurovegetative Features in Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: A Cross-Sectional Clinical Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- The gut microbiota-enteric nervous system axis: from bidirectional programming to precision therapeutics in digestive diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota signatures differentiate trajectory-defined response phenotypes and predict self-management outcomes in irritable bowel syndrome.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2026Article
- Frequency of FODMAP-rich products consumption and irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms among amateur runners.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain and alterations in bowel habits. Previous studies show variability in its prevalence according to region and diagnostic criteria used. The objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the global prevalence of IBS, considering studies that used Rome III and IV criteria. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scielo through March 2024. Observational studies reporting IBS prevalence using Rome III or IV criteria were included. Studies in specific populations, conference abstracts, and gray literature were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using Munn's tool for prevalence studies. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, subgroup analyses by probabilistic sampling, meta-regressions by year, and publication bias assessment through funnel plots. Results: Forty-three studies (26 Rome III, 17 Rome IV) with 188,885 participants were included. The global prevalence was 13.21% (95% confidence interval (CI): 10.70-15.94%) with Rome III and 17.14% (95% CI: 12.00-22.99%) with Rome IV. When considering only studies with probabilistic sampling, prevalences adjusted to 11.19% and 13.28%, respectively. Higher prevalence was found in women (Rome III: 15.69% vs. 11.10% in men; Rome IV: 20.17% vs. 11.45%). Meta-regression showed a trend toward increased prevalence in recent years. Conclusion: Rome IV showed a higher prevalence than Rome III, possibly due to a more precise definition of abdominal pain. The heterogeneity found suggests the need to standardize methodologies and conduct more studies with probabilistic sampling, especially in underrepresented regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.