ReviewJournal of healthcare leadership2025
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Narrative Review of Recent Clinical Applications, Implementation Strategies, and Challenges.
Review in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for oral cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of image-based and non-imaging models.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Accessibility Recommendations of Interfaces Designed for Individuals with Mental and Physical Disabilities: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Framework for artificial intelligence implementation research in healthcare: synthesizing current evidence on barriers and facilitators.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical documentation demands are increasingly eroding clinician time and morale. Large language models (LLMs) are emerging as practical allies, drafting notes in real-time and laying the groundwork for decision support. This narrative review examines both recent clinical applications of AI across healthcare domains and leadership strategies for implementing these technologies in hospitals and ambulatory networks. We conducted a narrative review of recent literature and high-quality practice reports published, focusing on leadership strategies for implementing LLMs in hospitals and ambulatory networks. Evidence shows that when executives establish multidisciplinary AI committees, run quickly iterated pilots, and embed continuous bias and safety audits, LLM deployments improve workflow efficiency and clinician satisfaction without compromising quality. Effective programs pair clear vendor scorecards with transparent communication to staff and patients and align metrics with broader equity goals. Recent regulatory frameworks in North America and Europe reinforce the need for life-cycle governance and performance monitoring. The review concludes with a leadership roadmap linking strategic vision to practical actions that sustain safe, equitable, and financially sound LLM integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.