Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41488804›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2026

Digital Eye: Deep Learning for Detecting Physeal Fractures of the Pediatric Distal Radius.

Nathan Chaclas, David VanEenenaam, Vineet Desai, Joey Logan, Scott J Mahon, John M Flynn, Apurva S Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathan ChaclasDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David VanEenenaamDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Vineet DesaiDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Joey LoganDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Scott J MahonDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
John M FlynnDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Apurva S ShahDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Distal radial fractures (DRFs) are some of the most common pediatric injuries, often involving the physis. Diagnostic accuracy can be challenging for physicians unfamiliar with managing pediatric injuries, with misdiagnosis rates reported as high as 46% [1-3]. These patients frequently do not present to a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon or musculoskeletal radiologist initially. Therefore, the development of tools to classify DRFs by physeal involvement could improve diagnostic accuracy and hence enhance patient safety. We propose to fine-tune convolutional neural networks (CNNs), a class of artificial intelligence models that are highly effective at analyzing and interpreting visual data like radiographs, to classify skeletally immature DRF radiographs by physeal involvement. Methods: DRF radiographs from skeletally immature patients aged 4 to 18 years were identified from a database at a single tertiary-care children's hospital. All fractures were classified regarding physeal involvement by a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon. We fine-tuned a particularly powerful family of CNNs (EfficientNet) on the dataset and calculated the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of the classification. To interpret the model's predictions, we used gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM), a technique that visualizes the gradient-weighted class activation maps of the convolutional layers, to highlight regions of the radiographs that the model learned to focus on for classification. Results: 2,103 radiographs comprised of anteroposterior and lateral views from 1,082 patients (655 [60.5%] male, mean age: 10 ± 5.7 years) were included. There were 425 views of 203 physeal fractures and 1,678 views of 879 nonphyseal fractures. The best model was EfficientNet-B2, which achieved a validation accuracy of 84% and a test accuracy of 84% in identifying physeal fractures. The model had high precision (81%), recall (89%), and F1-score (0.86) on the test set. Conclusions: Fine-tuning an EfficientNet model can achieve high accuracy in identifying physeal fractures. Furthermore, Grad-CAM provides interpretability and transparency for the model's predictions, highlighting regions of interest and potential sources of error. Results suggest that CNNs can be a powerful tool for fracture classification and that EfficientNet is a promising architecture for this task. Future work should include expanding the dataset with more diverse and balanced samples and testing the model on different views and fracture patterns. Key Concepts: (1)Patients with physeal injuries often do not present to orthopaedists initially.(2)Tools to assist urgent care and emergency room physicians should be aimed at identifying which fractures need orthopaedic follow-up.(3)Convolutional neural networks are a worthwhile option for this task.(4)Historically, these networks have had difficulty differentiating a fracture from a physis.(5)Fine tuning EfficientNet in this study demonstrates an ability to separate physeal fractures from nonphyseal fractures, which could assist "front line" evaluators in determining the necessity of orthopaedic follow-up. Level of Evidence: III, retrospective cohort study.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networksFracture classificationPediatric distal radius fracturePhyseal fracture

Identifiers

PMID41488804
PMCPMC12756701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.