ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Parturition Synchrony Index: A Method for Assessing Individual Parturition Synchrony Within a Group or Population.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Parturition Synchrony Index: A Method for Assessing Individual Parturition Synchrony Within a Group or Population.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The phenomenon of parturition synchrony at the population level has been studied for decades using various methods. To assess the tendency of individual mothers to synchronize their parturition timing with others, we developed a novel parturition synchrony index (PSI). The PSI quantifies an individual mother's degree of parturition synchrony within a group or population by detecting variation in the synchrony of parturitions, regardless of their actual timing within the season. A value of 1 indicates complete synchrony (i.e., a parturition occurring on the same day as others), whereas values approaching 0 reflect increasing asynchrony. To evaluate the robustness of the PSI, we conducted simulations examining how parturition-date distribution (completely synchronous, lognormal, normal, bimodal, and uniform), parturition-season duration (1, 10, 50, 100, 200, and 365 days), and group size (5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 500, 1000, and 5000 mothers) influence the PSI and its inter-individual variability. A PSI value was calculated for each of the 140,490 individual mothers in the 168 simulated groups. For each group, we subsequently calculated both the mean PSI and the coefficient of variation (CV) of PSI values. All examined parameters influenced both metrics. Across all distributions (excluding complete synchrony), mean PSI values were higher in shorter than in longer parturition seasons. However, only in lognormal and normal distributions were mean PSI values markedly higher in larger than in smaller groups. Conversely, the CV was higher in longer seasons and in smaller groups across all distributions. Our results highlight the PSI's broad applicability to diverse socio-ecological contexts. However, its reliability decreases under constrained conditions, such as very short seasons or extremely small groups, where wider confidence intervals were observed. The PSI thus provides a robust and flexible tool for quantifying and functionally analyzing individual parturition synchrony in mammals, and potentially in other viviparous vertebrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.