ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Outcome of Ruthenium-106 Brachytherapy for Uveal Melanoma and Retinal Vascular Tumors: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brachytherapy in patients with uveal melanoma and retinal vascular tumors. Methods: Patients who received Ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) plaque brachytherapy at the Torfeh Medical Center between March 2016 and March 2022 were examined in this retrospective case-series. We collected clinical data on tumor features, treatment details, and patient outcomes. These data were analyzed using SPSS software. Tumor regression was the primary outcome that was monitored, with complications being evaluated as secondary outcomes. Results: Of the 80 patients, 55 had melanoma, 21 had vasoproliferative tumor (VPT), and 4 had retinal capillary hemangioma (RCH). Tumor regression was observed in 74.5% of melanoma cases and 100% of VPT/RCH cases. Significant relationships were found between tumor characteristics, such as thickness and dose rate at the apex, and treatment outcomes. Complications included radiation retinopathy and cataract formation, with recurrence rates of 16.4% in melanoma and 7.7% in VPT/RCH. Conclusions: Ru-106 plaque brachytherapy is effective in treating various intraocular tumors, particularly VPT/RCH. Tumor thickness significantly influences treatment outcomes, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches in brachytherapy planning. However, small sample sizes for specific tumor types limited the generalization of the outcomes. Future research should focus on refining techniques and mitigating complications to improve patient outcomes in ocular oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.