ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Central Toxic Keratopathy after Photorefractive Keratectomy: Two-Year Follow-Up Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report a rare case of central toxic keratopathy (CTK) after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: A 22-year-old male underwent bilateral PRK for the correction of myopic astigmatism. Preoperative refraction measurements were -2.50 -1.00 × 65 in the right eye and -3.50 diopter (D) sphere in the left eye. The intended refractive correction was -3.25 -1.00 × 65 (in the right eye) and -4.25 D sphere in the left eye. Preoperative corneal thickness measured 489 μm (in the right eye) and 491 μm in the left eye, both values exceeding the minimum safe threshold for PRK. Results: At the 1-week postoperative evaluation, slit-lamp examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed significant central corneal haziness, thinning, and flattening, along with hyperopic astigmatism. These findings were consistent with CTK. The surgeon adopted a conservative approach, closely monitoring the patient without initiating pharmacological intervention. By the 6-month follow-up, the patient demonstrated reduced hyperopia and achieved a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20. OCT imaging also confirmed increased central corneal and epithelial thickness, suggesting progressive recovery. Long-term follow-up over 2 years showed stable refraction and corneal thickness, with no further significant changes. Conclusions: CTK is a rare but vision-threatening complication of refractive surgery, occurring not only after laser
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.