ReviewOpen forum infectious diseases2026
The Impact of
Review in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sexually Transmitted Infections in adolescents and young adults: a growing public health challenge.Le infezioni in medicina · 2026Review
- Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Ureaplasma urealyticum in males of andrology clinics in Nanjing, China: a 10 years retrospective study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Literature from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Embase (2000 onward) was screened. Random-effects models were used in R, with subgroup analyses by geography, case definition, diagnostics, and matching criteria. Results: Out of 2941 records, 26 case-control studies (11 706 participants) met inclusion criteria. Most studies used molecular diagnostics (n = 23). A significant association was found between CT infection and male infertility (odds ratio [OR] 3.68 [95% CI 2.24-6.02]), with substantial heterogeneity ( Conclusions: While findings suggest that CT infection may impair male fertility, confounding, bias, and the lack of geographical representativeness limit inference. High-quality, large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm causality and guide targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.