ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Prolonged impairment of immunological memory after anti-CD20 treatment in pediatric idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: an extended follow-up.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Obinutuzumab as a primary anti-CD20 agent in pediatric frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Anti-CD20 therapy is an effective steroid-sparing option for pediatric idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), but long-term data on immune reconstitution are limited. Methods: Thirteen pediatric INS patients (7 males) were longitudinally evaluated at baseline, first long-term follow-up (mean 5.4 years), and extended follow-up (mean 6.6 years after the first follow-up, >3 years from the last anti-CD20 infusion). Clinical outcomes, B-cell subsets, serum immunoglobulin levels, vaccine competence, and infection rates were analyzed. Results: At the first follow-up, most patients had received one (n=6) or two (n=6) anti-CD20 courses; at the extended follow-up, five had undergone additional treatments. Four patients remained relapse-free during follow-up, whereas eight of nine who had previously relapsed continued to experience disease recurrence despite further anti-CD20 therapy. Oral immunosuppressant tapering improved: three patients were off therapy at first follow-up and six at the latest. Total, transitional and mature-naïve B cells reconstituted to normal ranges according to age over time. In contrast, total, IgM, and switched memory B cells remained significantly reduced (p<0.01). Patients in sustained remission exhibited lower switched memory B-cell counts than relapsing patients (p<0.05). Serum IgG levels increased at the extended follow-up, although six patients remained below normal. Four developed severe Conclusions: Anti-CD20 therapy offers durable disease control and allows immunosuppressant reduction in pediatric INS, but persistent memory B-cell and humoral impairment warrant long-term immunologic monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.