ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2026
Operationalizing Access for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell Therapies: A Cross-functional Perspective.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the Gap: Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to CAR-T Access Through Streamlined and Standardized Pathways.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026Article
- Engineering the future of advanced therapy medicinal products: a bioengineering call to action.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) treatment efficacy has been shown to be greater in those who receive timely infusions, while mortality rates increase with each month's delay in treatment. Yet health care infrastructure constraints, an intricate treatment process, and reimbursement complexities present challenges that affect timely patient access to CAR T therapy. Best practices for decreasing time to treatment are not well established. Autolus Inc convened an expert panel of 3 advisors from established hematopoietic stem-cell transplant centers and 3 advisors with extensive national or regional payer experience to identify operational barriers that contribute to treatment delays as well as potential means for addressing them. Opportunities exist to expand treatment capacity by reducing redundant prerequisites for treatment center certification and through collaboration between established centers and newer centers that need critical expertise to gain accreditation. Aligning clinical criteria are important for improving clinician understanding of the treatment process, facilitating timely referral to treatment centers, and streamlining payer authorization processes. Negotiating financial arrangements is the most time-consuming step of the process before CAR T manufacturing can begin; contracts between treatment centers and payers can help to facilitate timely care, but single-case agreements are necessary for treatment centers and payers without extensive CAR T experience. Single-case agreements should consider each side's experience and financial exposure. In identifying obstacles to timely care and working through potential solutions, participants developed a genuine appreciation for the interdependence among stakeholders. Recognition of mutual interest is a starting point for cross-functional cooperation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.