ArticlePostepy psychiatrii neurologii2025
Religiosity and anxiety in relation to health-promoting attitudes toward COVID-19.
Article in Postepy psychiatrii neurologii, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between religiosity and health-related attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic, including views on sanitary restrictions and vaccination. The study also examined the impact of anxiety levels on these attitudes, as well as preferred coping strategies among religious and non-religious individuals. Methods: The study was conducted online on a non-representative sample of 700 individuals, of whom 289 provided complete responses. A proprietary questionnaire, the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S), and the Mini-COPE inventory were used. Statistical analyses were performed using the χ Results: Religiosity was not significantly associated with adherence to preventive measures but was associated with greater skepticism toward restrictions in places of worship and vaccinations. Higher anxiety levels were associated with more frequent compliance with sanitary guidelines, regardless of degree of religiosity. Religious individuals were more likely to use coping strategies based on faith and social support, while non-religious ones more often relied on avoidance and helplessness strategies. Conclusions: Religiosity may serve a protective role in coping with pandemic-related stress but can also be associated with a lower acceptance of preventive measures. Anxiety emerged as a significant motivator for following recommendations, regardless of religious beliefs. These findings underscore the importance of addressing both emotional and spiritual factors in health communication strategies during epidemiological crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.