ArticleJournal of hematology2025
Efficacy and Safety of Daratumumab, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Therapy in the First Relapse of Multiple Myeloma Patients - Real World Data from Hungary.
Article in Journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Hungarian Real-World Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Daratumumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, which has demonstrated efficacy in both newly diagnosed and relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The objective of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-Rd) regimen as a second-line therapy in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: A total of 55 Hungarian patients with MM were enrolled, all of whom received D-Rd at first relapse through a special reimbursement program between February 2022 and August 2023. Treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed in the intent-to-treat population as well as in selected subgroups. Safety outcomes were also systematically collected. Results: Treatment response was observed in 49 patients (89%), with 12 complete responses, 22 very good partial responses, and 15 partial responses. After a median follow-up of 36.6 months, the median PFS for the entire cohort was 22.0 months, while median OS had not been reached yet. Patients with advanced-stage disease (Revised International Staging System stage 3) showed significantly poorer survival outcomes compared with those in stage 1 or 2 (PFS: P < 0.001; OS: P = 0.015). High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and frailty were also associated with markedly inferior prognosis. In contrast, neither prior autologous stem cell transplantation nor lenalidomide maintenance therapy had a significant impact on survival. During the study period, three deaths due to severe infections occurred, while the most common adverse events were mild hematologic toxicities and injection-related reactions. Conclusions: Our findings support the use of D-Rd as an effective option for first relapse in MM patients. However, our survival data are inferior to the results of the pivotal studies targeting the same population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.