ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
Poly-L-Lactic Acid in Facial Rejuvenation: Volumetric Data Supporting Regenerative Outcomes.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term In Vivo Biological Performance of PLLA-b-PEG/HA Filler.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Regenerative Functional Microspheres for Aesthetic Medicine: Mechanism, Materials, Fabrication, and Clinical Applications.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Objective and subjective retrospective evaluation of XERF, a novel single-shot dual-frequency non-invasive monopolar radiofrequency.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Poly-L-Lactic acid (Sculptra Objective: To retrospectively evaluate long-term outcomes of PLLA-SCA treatment in 28 female patients using 3D imaging analysis, focusing on two protocols; (1) full-face skin firming and (2) skin firming with additional targeted volumisation and/or asymmetry correction. Methods: A retrospective review of clinical data and standardised 3D stereophotogrammetric imaging was performed two years post-treatment. Patients were divided into the two treatment strategy groups. Volume differences were quantified using validated reconstruction software, and clinical outcomes were assessed through physician evaluation and patient-reported satisfaction. Results: All patients demonstrated measurable soft tissue volume formation at two years, ranging from 0.75cc to 6.4cc per vial of PLLA-SCA. Skin quality improvement and facial harmonisation were consistently observed. No untoward effects, such as vascular compromise, nodules, or granulomas, were reported. Conclusion: PLLA-SCA produces sustained soft-tissue formation and skin firming effects, persisting for at least two years. The findings support PLLA-SCA as an effective regenerative agent with long-lasting volumising and tissue enhancing properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.