ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
Predictive Modeling of the Risk of Hyperglycemia in Psoriasis Patients Using Machine Learning: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to develop and validate machine learning models for predicting hyperglycemia risk in psoriasis patients. Methods: Clinical data from 575 psoriasis patients admitted to the Department of Dermatology were collected and randomly split into a training set and an internal test set in a 7:3 ratio. An external test set was derived from 135 psoriasis patients enrolled in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) during 2003-2004 and 2011-2012. Eleven machine learning algorithms, including decision trees, random forests, extreme gradient boosting (XGboost), light gradient boosting machine, support vector machines, multilayer perceptron, K-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, lasso regression, ridge regression, and elastic net, were systematically compared. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves and clinical decision curve (DCA). Results: The extreme gradient boosting (XGboost) was selected as the final predictive model due to its robust performance across multiple evaluation metrics. The area under the curve values for the training, internal, and external test sets were 0.821 (95% confidence Interval (CI): 0.775-0.866), 0.820 (95% CI: 0.751-0.888), and 0.788 (95% CI: 0.695-0.881), respectively. Calibration and clinical decision curve analysis confirmed the model's accuracy and clinical utility. Additionally, a web-based calculator was developed to improve the model's accessibility and application. Conclusion: The XGBoost-based model effectively predicts hyperglycemia risk in psoriasis patients, emphasizing personalized treatment plans for high-risk individuals to manage hyperglycemia progression and psoriasis-related inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.