ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
Diagnostic Performance of High-Frequency Ultrasound and Ultra-High-Frequency Ultrasound in Distinguishing Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans from Dermatofibroma: A 15-year Period Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultra-high-frequency ultrasound in the detection of recurrent conjunctival melanoma: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) and dermatofibroma (DF) are cutaneous lesions with overlapping clinical features, often requiring histopathological confirmation. This study aims to evaluate and compare the diagnostic utility of high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) and ultra-high-frequency ultrasound (UHFUS) in distinguishing these two entities over 15-year period. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 334 patients (127 DFSP, 207 DF) with pathologically confirmed diagnoses. HFUS or UHFUS was used to assess lesion characteristics, including demographics, location, size, morphology, echogenicity, homogeneity, posterior acoustic features, and vascularity. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify significant predictors. Results: DFSP patients were significantly older than DF patients (40.99 years vs 34.00 years; Conclusion: HFUS and UHFUS demonstrates strong diagnostic utility in differentiating DFSP from DF based on key clinical and sonographic features. These findings support the use of HFUS and UHFUS as a valuable non-invasive tool for preoperative diagnosis. Future studies should validate these criteria in multi-center settings and exploring artificial intelligence integration to further enhance diagnostic accuracy and standardization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.