ArticleData in brief2026
PCB-defect: An annotated dataset for surface defect detection in printed circuit boards.
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DefectAtlas-20: A real-world image dataset for joint material and surface-condition classification.Data in brief · 2026Article
- PCB-defect: An annotated dataset for surface defect detection in printed circuit boards.Data in brief · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The PCB-Defect dataset was developed to advance automated defect detection in Printed Circuit Boards. This dataset presents a comprehensive collection of 230 annotated high-resolution images of single-layer PCBs, manufactured through a controlled laboratory process. The curated diversity in PCB layouts, defect types, image quality, and annotation density supports the development of robust computer vision models for defect detection. Each board was fabricated using chemical etching on FR4 substrates to introduce manufacturing defects, including missing pad, mouse bite, open circuit, short circuit, spur, and spurious copper. The defect types were embedded at the design phase, physically realized during etching, and confirmed post-manufacturing. Images range from 800 × 600 to 6000 × 4000 pixels, averaging 6.61 megapixels. Detailed bounding box annotations for all visible defect instances were produced using the Roboflow tool, resulting in a total of 1704 annotated defects across the dataset with about 7.4 annotation per image. Annotations follow the COCO (Common Objects in Context) JSON format, which includes detailed metadata and precise localization of each defect by category and bounding box coordinates. This dataset offers significant reuse potential for both academic and industrial research communities focusing on automated optical inspection, quality control, and transfer learning applications
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.