ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
The safety and efficacy of non-emergent percutaneous coronary intervention via distal radial artery access in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of distal transradial access (dTRA) for non-emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: This single-center, randomized controlled study was conducted in the Department of Cardiology at Inner Mongolia Medical University Affiliated Hospital between January and July 2025. Patients with ACS who met the inclusion criteria were assigned to the distal transradial access (dTRA) group or the conventional transradial access (TRA) group at a 1:1 ratio using a random number table method. Clinical baseline data and operation data were collected. Radial artery Doppler ultrasound was performed 24 h and 30 days after PCI to detect radial artery occlusion (RAO). Results: A total of 106 patients were included in the study, with no significant differences in clinical baseline data and operation data between the two groups. The incidence of RAO at 24 h after PCI in the dTRA group was significantly lower than that in the TRA group (1.9% vs. 15.1%, Conclusions: For ACS patients undergoing non-emergent PCI, dTRA is a safe and effective approach. dTRA significantly reduced the incidence of RAO at 24 h after PCI and had a shorter hemostasis time, without affecting the interventional procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.