Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41488445›Full record

ReviewJournal of Brown hospital medicine2025

Bridging Inpatient and Outpatient Care: A Scoping Review on Discharge Summary Documentation Timeliness and Quality.

Ninah C Foad, Jacqueline Lippert, William C Lippert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Brown hospital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ninah C FoadWake Forest University.
Jacqueline LippertDepartment of Internal Medicine Wake Forest University School of Medicine.
William C LippertDepartment of Internal Medicine Wake Forest University School of Medicine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7684-7553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Discharge summaries serve as comprehensive documentation of a patient's hospitalization and are essential for communicating with subsequent care providers. Despite their importance, discharge summaries often vary in both content and timing, leading to potential communication gaps that can adversely affect patient outcomes. # MethodsWe conducted a structured literature review using PubMed and Google Scholar, focusing on peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2025. Articles were included if they addressed the relationship between discharge summary completion time, quality, and patient outcomes. Results: Timely and high-quality discharge summaries are critical for effective communication between hospital-based and outpatient clinicians. Delayed or incomplete summaries are associated with increased readmission rates. Studies emphasize that the quality of the summary is equally, if not more, important than timeliness in ensuring continuity of care. Conclusion: Discharge summary timeliness and content quality both significantly impact continuity of care and readmission risk. Standardization efforts and future innovations, including AI-assisted documentation, present promising opportunities for improvement.

Indexed as

Care TransitionsDischarge SummaryDocumentation QualityDocumentation TimelinessReadmissions

Identifiers

PMID41488445
PMCPMC12764330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.