ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology
Comparative evaluation of AI language models in educating patients on women's sexual health.
Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in patient education, especially with the rise in popularity of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and DeepSeek, offering quick, accessible answers to health-related queries. Yet, in female sexual health, a field historically under-researched and stigmatized, AI's role in patient-facing education has yet to be thoroughly explored. Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy and relevance of responses from ChatGPT, Copilot, and DeepSeek to common female sexual health questions, comparing them to the Prosayla website and to each other. Design and methods: Twelve questions were developed based on content from the Prosayla website, covering topics ranging from menopause to sexual dysfunction. Responses were collected from the three LLMs and Prosayla. Two female sexual medicine experts independently rated each response for accuracy and relevance utilizing a six-point Likert scale (0-5) with a double-blind design being used to minimize bias. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc analyses were used to assess statistical significance ( Results: No significant differences in accuracy scores were observed across the four sources for Physician A ( Conclusion: AI models demonstrated comparable accuracy to Prosayla (a trusted patient education source), with the models being more relevant for one of the raters. These findings suggest that AI tools may complement traditional educational materials and support patient learning. However, expert oversight remains essential to ensure content quality and appropriateness. Future efforts should develop structured strategies and implementation frameworks to responsibly integrate AI into patient education, particularly in sensitive areas like women's sexual health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.