Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41488380›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2026

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation Utilizing Gait Metrics as Outcomes - A Scoping Review.

Kyle Southall, Matthew P Ithurburn, C Scott Bickel, Harshvardhan Singh, Megan Bell, Christopher P Hurt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kyle SouthallProgram in Rehabilitation Science University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Matthew P IthurburnAmerican Sports Medicine Institute.
C Scott BickelPhysical Therapy Samford University.
Harshvardhan SinghOklahoma State University.
Megan BellUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Christopher P HurtProgram in Rehabilitation Science University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a growing body of knowledge linking common gait maladaptations seen in patients who have undergone an anterior cruciate ligament repair (ACLR) procedure and early-onset OA of the knee. These maladaptations present during the early stages of recovery following ACLR and often persist up to five to seven years, and likely beyond, after surgery. Purpose: The purpose of this scoping review was to investigate the literature on therapeutic interventions after ACLR whose purpose is to normalize gait biomechanics. Study Design: Scoping Review. Methods: PubMed, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched using predefined terms such as Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Gait, Locomotion. Two authors independently reviewed abstracts and full texts. Inclusion criteria included: 1) articles published between 1990 and 2023, 2) written in English, 3) conducted using human participants, 4) full text available, 5) included participants who were between the ages of 18-35 years and had undergone an ACLR procedure within five years of the relevant intervention, and 6) included outcomes measures focused on walking/gait metrics after receiving a therapeutic intervention. Exclusion criteria were Case studies, case series, and studies using non-living subjects, such as animal studies or human cadaver studies. Results: Of the 2873 potential studies 14 studies including 404 participants met all criteria. Six studies included targeted strengthening as an adjunct to a normal ACLR rehabilitation protocol, two included partial bodyweight training via treadmill, three included assistive devices for gait or real time feedback via assistive devices, two included vibration therapy, and one included a harmonic oscillator intervention. The high variability of interventions on a limited number of participants makes it difficult to generalize their applicability in the clinical setting on a large scale. Especially as few studies have evaluated the effects of interventions specifically on gait metrics. Conclusion: There is a noted lack of standardization of prospective interventions to normalize gait after ACLR that also includes a long-term follow-up. These interventions are important to potentially help preserve long-term knee health in individuals with ACLR. There is a present need for rigorous therapeutic intervention that addresses common gait maladaptations after ACLR to potentially help preserve the long-term knee health in individuals with ACLR. Level of Evidence: 2.

Indexed as

ACLR RehabilitationGait TrainingOutcome Mappingscoping review

Identifiers

PMID41488380
PMCPMC12758930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.