ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2026
Clinical Utility of the Japanese Version of the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score for Detecting Upper Extremity Dysfunction in High-School Baseball Players.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Which Myofascial Alterations Contribute to Functional Limitations and Perceived Performance Deficits in Water Polo Athletes.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Upper extremity injuries are prevalent among high school baseball players, many of whom continue playing despite mild or early symptoms. Although the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC) is a validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) for overhead athletes, its sensitivity in identifying early dysfunction in field-active adolescent athletes remains unclear. Hypothesis/Purpose: This study aimed to determine the clinical utility of the Japanese version of the KJOC (J-KJOC) for identifying symptomatic high school baseball players and to establish a cutoff score for the early detection of upper extremity dysfunction. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A total of 86 high school male baseball players were categorized into three groups based on their self-reported J-KJOC: asymptomatic, symptomatic but active, and inactive symptomatic. All participants underwent physical assessments, including shoulder range of motion, isometric shoulder strength, grip strength, and pinch strength measurements. Between-group comparisons, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and logistic regression were conducted to determine the discriminative performance of the J-KJOC and its association with physical assessments. Results: The mean age of the participants was 16.3 ± 0.8 years. The J-KJOC scores differed significantly among the three groups (p < 0.01), whereas no significant differences were found in the physical assessments. The ROC analysis revealed a J-KJOC cutoff score of 87.6 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.815, yielding 81.5% sensitivity and 72.8% specificity for distinguishing symptomatic players. Logistic regression analysis revealed that only the J-KJOC score, and not conventional physical parameters, was significantly associated with symptoms while playing, across all models. Conclusion: The J-KJOC demonstrated superior sensitivity to conventional physical assessments in detecting upper extremity dysfunction in high school baseball players. A cutoff score of 87.6 may serve as a valuable screening threshold for early intervention and injury prevention in high school baseball athletes. Level of Evidence: Level 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.