ReviewLancet regional health. Americas2026
Mapping the expressions and impacts of racism on health in Brazil: a scoping review.
Review in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a Community Intervention for Food and Nutritional Education in Quilombola Communities of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: A Community Assessment with Quanti-Quali Approach.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Rare diseases in Brazil: a nationwide analysis of the diagnostic odyssey.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Review
- Dementia and cognitive decline in Black Brazilians: a narrative review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We conducted a scoping review to examine how racism affects the health of minoritized populations in Brazil. A comprehensive search was carried out, and identified articles underwent independent double screening. The 145 included studies consistently highlighted structural health inequities, with White advantage functioning as a protective factor. Institutional racism restricts healthcare access and availability, exacerbating minoritized populations' vulnerability to violence and disease through discrimination and substandard care. Spatial segregation further exposes minoritized populations to harmful environmental conditions and limited infrastructure, while traditional and migrant communities experience marginalization, social isolation, increased disease exposure, and poorer livelihoods. Interpersonal racism negatively impacts mental and physical health across the lifespan, with gender and socioeconomic conditions intersecting and shaping these experiences. The study provides critical insights for practice, policy, and research by demonstrating how racism at multiple levels shapes health inequities in Brazil and by emphasizing the need for human rights-centred, redistributive interventions that promote justice, equity, and inclusive care for minoritized populations. Funding: This publication was funded by Edital 02/2025-PRPPG/UFBA (Scientific Publications Support Program) and by the CNPq Productivity in Research Scholarship (process number 306359/2024-3).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.