Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41488298›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Investigating the establishment of the rumen and oral bacterial communities in beef cattle and assessing the applicability of using the oral bacterial community composition as a proxy for rumen bacterial community structure in cattle.

Seidu Adams, Andrew Lakamp, Nirosh Aluthge, Emma Laible, John Dustin Loy, Matthew L Spangler, Samodha C Fernando

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seidu AdamsDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Andrew LakampDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Nirosh AluthgeDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Emma LaibleDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
John Dustin LoySchool of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Matthew L SpanglerDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Samodha C FernandoDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have investigated the rumen microbiome composition and functions to improve ruminant agriculture and its environmental impacts. Yet, sample collection for rumen microbiome analysis can be difficult and invasive, hindering the ability to sample large animal populations. Studies have proposed using oral swabs as an alternative to rumen sample collection. Here, we investigated the potential of using the oral bacterial community as a proxy for the rumen bacterial community during the cattle production cycle. Methods: We investigated the development of the bovine rumen and oral bacterial communities using longitudinal sampling and the applicability of using the oral to predict host phenotypes. To this end, we utilized 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize and compare the rumen and oral bacterial community composition over multiple time points using amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) in a beef cattle population of 166 animals. Additionally, host phenotype of weaning weight was predicted using the Bayesian ridge regression model to evaluate the applicability of using the oral bacterial community for phenotype prediction. Results: Our results identified the rumen and oral bacterial communities to have different trajectories of assembly. The proportion of Discussion: Results from this study suggest that oral and rumen bacterial communities are distinctive, and the oral bacterial community may not serve as a good proxy for the rumen bacterial community even in adult animals with a well-established microbiome. However, the oral bacterial community may serve as a proxy for phenotypic traits of interest in beef cattle.

Indexed as

16S rRNA genecattlehost phenotypesmicrobiomeoral bacterial communityrumen bacterial community

Identifiers

PMID41488298
PMCPMC12757392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.