ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Investigating the establishment of the rumen and oral bacterial communities in beef cattle and assessing the applicability of using the oral bacterial community composition as a proxy for rumen bacterial community structure in cattle.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Methane emissions in beef cattle: A review of measurements and mitigation strategies.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Studies have investigated the rumen microbiome composition and functions to improve ruminant agriculture and its environmental impacts. Yet, sample collection for rumen microbiome analysis can be difficult and invasive, hindering the ability to sample large animal populations. Studies have proposed using oral swabs as an alternative to rumen sample collection. Here, we investigated the potential of using the oral bacterial community as a proxy for the rumen bacterial community during the cattle production cycle. Methods: We investigated the development of the bovine rumen and oral bacterial communities using longitudinal sampling and the applicability of using the oral to predict host phenotypes. To this end, we utilized 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize and compare the rumen and oral bacterial community composition over multiple time points using amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) in a beef cattle population of 166 animals. Additionally, host phenotype of weaning weight was predicted using the Bayesian ridge regression model to evaluate the applicability of using the oral bacterial community for phenotype prediction. Results: Our results identified the rumen and oral bacterial communities to have different trajectories of assembly. The proportion of Discussion: Results from this study suggest that oral and rumen bacterial communities are distinctive, and the oral bacterial community may not serve as a good proxy for the rumen bacterial community even in adult animals with a well-established microbiome. However, the oral bacterial community may serve as a proxy for phenotypic traits of interest in beef cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.