Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41488296›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Implementing whole genome sequencing for foodborne pathogen surveillance: insights and recommendations based on expert experiences.

Roan Pijnacker, Maaike van den Beld, Alexander Ullrich, Pieter-Jan Ceyssens, Dieter van Cauteren, Solveig Jore, Eva Møller Nielsen, Steen Ethelberg, Stefano Morabito, Maren Lanzl and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Roan PijnackerCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Maaike van den BeldCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Alexander UllrichDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Pieter-Jan CeyssensDivision of Human Bacterial Diseases, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Dieter van CauterenScientific Directorate of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Solveig JoreSection of Zoonotic and Waterborne Infections, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Eva Møller NielsenDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Steen EthelbergDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stefano MorabitoDepartment of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Maren LanzlCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Eelco FranzCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly used as the primary typing method for foodborne disease surveillance. It offers high-resolution cluster analysis, interoperability, and comprehensive pathogen characterization. However, implementing WGS-based foodborne surveillance also poses challenges. This paper outlines these challenges and provides practical recommendations. It requires a business plan that details the financial, technical and human resources needed, since setting up WGS-based surveillance requires substantial initial investments. During the initial phase, the per sample costs of WGS are likely higher than with traditional typing method. However, this will align or even go below that when fully transitioned to WGS-based surveillance because WGS data can be used for multiple purposes such as (sero)typing and antimicrobial and virulence characterization. It is advisable to start with a single pathogen to establish a solid foundation, with the aim of having one institutional sequencing facility. Validating accuracy and consistency of results is crucial before expanding to other pathogens. While cross-disciplinary collaboration has always played an important role in foodborne surveillance, the complexity of WGS results now makes it essential for transforming findings into effective interventions. Despite its challenges, advancements in technology and computation capabilities have made it increasingly accessible, ultimately improving public health surveillance and response.

Indexed as

foodborne pathogensgenomic epidemiologypublic healthsurveillancewhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41488296
PMCPMC12756440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.