ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Implementing whole genome sequencing for foodborne pathogen surveillance: insights and recommendations based on expert experiences.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly used as the primary typing method for foodborne disease surveillance. It offers high-resolution cluster analysis, interoperability, and comprehensive pathogen characterization. However, implementing WGS-based foodborne surveillance also poses challenges. This paper outlines these challenges and provides practical recommendations. It requires a business plan that details the financial, technical and human resources needed, since setting up WGS-based surveillance requires substantial initial investments. During the initial phase, the per sample costs of WGS are likely higher than with traditional typing method. However, this will align or even go below that when fully transitioned to WGS-based surveillance because WGS data can be used for multiple purposes such as (sero)typing and antimicrobial and virulence characterization. It is advisable to start with a single pathogen to establish a solid foundation, with the aim of having one institutional sequencing facility. Validating accuracy and consistency of results is crucial before expanding to other pathogens. While cross-disciplinary collaboration has always played an important role in foodborne surveillance, the complexity of WGS results now makes it essential for transforming findings into effective interventions. Despite its challenges, advancements in technology and computation capabilities have made it increasingly accessible, ultimately improving public health surveillance and response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.