Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41488293›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Intercropping with

Huiyong Zheng, Yanming Zhu, Penghui Liao, Fengfang Lin, Wei Ye, Fanghua Mao, Liang Fang, Yanghui Fang, Hailan Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Huiyong Zheng *Digital Agriculture Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, China.
Yanming Zhu *Institute of Crop Sciences, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Fujian Germplasm Resources Center), Fuzhou, China.
Penghui LiaoFujian Forestry Science and Technology Extension General Station, Fuzhou, China.
Fengfang LinInstitute of Crop Sciences, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Fujian Germplasm Resources Center), Fuzhou, China.
Wei YeSanming Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanming, China.
Fanghua MaoInstitute of Crop Sciences, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Fujian Germplasm Resources Center), Fuzhou, China.
Liang FangCollege of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Yanghui FangFujian Forestry Science and Technology Extension General Station, Fuzhou, China.
Hailan SuInstitute of Crop Sciences, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Fujian Germplasm Resources Center), Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Optimizing the cultivation of Methods: This study conducted a comparative analysis between monoculture cultivation of Results: Both intercropping systems significantly enhanced nutrient accumulation in the rhizosphere. Specifically, the PCG system increased available potassium by 72.76%, while the PCPP system elevated alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and total nitrogen by 7.19% and 7.02%, respectively, relative to PC. Additionally, both intercropping systems increased the relative abundance of microbial taxa such as Discussion: These findings indicate that intercropping modulates

Indexed as

forest-based cultivationnutrient-microbe interactionsPolygonatum cyrtonemapolysaccharidesrhizosphere microbial communities

Identifiers

PMID41488293
PMCPMC12756931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.