ArticleEJVES vascular forum2026
Validation of a Deep Learning U-Net Algorithm for Multistructure Segmentation of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms including Lumen, Thrombus, and Calcifications.
Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-centre Validation of Automated Outer-to-Outer Wall Segmentation of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using a nnU-Net Based Model.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Artificial intelligence and digital twin technologies provide a new way to plan endovascular interventions and can help practitioners anticipate complications. The accuracy of these methods is based on reliable automated aortic segmentation, including intraluminal thrombus (ILT), calcifications, and detection of collateral arteries. The aim of this study was to validate a new fully automated deep learning based aortic segmentation algorithm that could be used for optimised digital twin generation. Methods: After training on 1280 computed tomography angiography scans, including 1000 for pre-training and 280 for fine tuning, a convolutional neural network based on a U-Net architecture was externally validated on 48 computed tomography angiography scans to segment lumen, collateral arteries, ILT, and parietal calcifications of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries. Blinded, manually corrected segmentations from a senior radiologist and surgeon were performed to create the ground truth comparison. Results: The comparison between fully automated and manually corrected segmentation methods revealed a mean dice similarity coefficient of 0.97 ± 0.01, 0.94 ± 0.05, and 0.87 ± 0.04 for aortic lumen, ILT, and calcifications, respectively. Average surface distance was 0.30 ± 0.15, 0.61 ± 0.72, and 0.28 ± 0.28 mm for aortic lumen, ILT, and calcifications, respectively. Mean segmentation time was four minutes and 20 seconds with the fully automated method. Conclusion: The deep learning algorithm developed in this study provided valid, fast, and accurate aorto-iliac segmentation. This may be used to automatically generate reliable aortic digital twins for endovascular aortic repair planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.