ArticleJPRAS open2026
Clinical analysis of complete survival outcomes in digital replantation with a focus on avulsion injuries.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we defined complete digital survival as the primary outcome and systematically examined preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors influencing this outcome. We enrolled 124 digits replanted and evaluated the correlation between complete survival and preoperative factors such as age, Tamai's zone classification, injury mechanism, smoking, daily cigarette consumption, diabetes, and complete/incomplete amputation. We considered avulsion to be a factor that could influence intraoperative and postoperative factors. Multiple logistic regression was performed with intraoperative and postoperative variables, such as the number of vessel anastomoses and rescue surgery. The characteristics of this study included 29 % avulsions, 39 % crushes, 29 % blunt cuts, and 6 % clean cuts. The total complete survival rate was 80 %. Multiple logistic regression adjusted for avulsion showed that the number of arteries, veins, and number of vein anastomoses ≥ number of artery anastomoses significantly contributed to complete survival in the whole study. However, the success of the replanted digits that needed rescue surgery was significantly poorer than that in the case without rescue surgery. In addition, the vessel transfer, such as vein grafting, was useful for replanting digits in cases with severe vessel damage. We should anastomose as many veins and arteries as possible and perform vessel transfer to replace the damaged vessel during the initial surgery. This effort in replantation may reduce reoperation rates and improve the chances of complete survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.