ReviewBrain & spine2026
Complications associated with anterior cervical spine surgery: A systematic review of literature.
Review in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone Fusion in the Cervical Spine: Where Are We Now?Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Risk factors for postoperative epidural hematoma after microsurgical decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Anterior cervical spine surgery has become a widely accepted approach for treating various cervical spine pathologies. Research question: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the frequency, etiology and outcomes of complications associated with anterior cervical spine surgery. Material/methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple databases (CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE) for peer-reviewed articles published in English from January 1st, 1989 to December 31st, 2024. Studies involving adult patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery were included. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Results: Dysphagia emerged as the most common complication, with rates varying widely (2.3 %-87.5 %) depending on timing of assessment and methodology. Other significant complications included adjacent segment disease with the range varying from 0.4 % to 32 %, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (0.1 %-9 %), infection (0.39 %-8.5 %), pseudarthrosis (0.25 %-31 %), esophageal perforation (0.1 %-0.45 %), vertebral artery injury (0.3 %-7.7 %), Horner's syndrome (0.06 %-0.45 %), graft failure (2.7 %-35.5 %), CSF leak (0 %-1 %), postoperative hematoma (0.21 %-7 %) and deteriorating or new neurological deficits (0.37 % -3.3). Multilevel disease, revision surgery and OPLL were associated with higher complication rate. Surgeon's experience and higher case volume were consistently correlated with lower complication rates. Discussion & conclusion: While anterior cervical spine surgery is generally safe and effective, it carries risks of various complications ranging from common but typically self-limiting to rare but potentially severe. Μinimizing these complications depends on thorough preoperative planning, careful patient selection, and proper surgical technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.