ArticleJournal of medical ultrasound
Role of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Chronic Appendicitis: An Observational Study of 400 Cases.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reply to the Comment on "Role of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Chronic Appendicitis: An Observational Study of 400 Cases".Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
- Comment on Role of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Chronic Appendicitis: An Observational Study of 400 Cases.Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic appendicitis is an uncommon clinical entity. Unlike acute appendicitis, the presence of nonspecific clinical features makes it a challenging diagnosis. Imaging modalities such as ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) scans aid in the diagnosis of chronic appendicitis. CT scan has been widely described as the investigation of choice in previous studies. However, ultrasonography of the abdomen is a readily available and cheap alternative which provides comparable results and protects from radiation hazards. The aim of this study was to identify the core imaging features of chronic appendicitis on ultrasonography, their correlation with histopathology findings and to establish the most sensitive parameters for radiological diagnosis of chronic appendicitis. Methods: This was an observational research study which employed a descriptive study design. All patients suffering from chronic/recurrent abdominal pain in the epigastric, periumbilical region or right lower quadrant were included in the study. The patients were subjected to history taking and clinical examination. Ultrasonography was performed by graded compression technique with high-frequency linear transducer. The specimens of the patients undergoing open or laparoscopic appendectomy were sent for histopathology. The preoperative ultrasonography diagnosis was confirmed on histopathology examination. Results: Based on the statistical analysis of various major and minor criteria that were described in this study, the presence of localized pain in the right iliac fossa coupled with the ultrasonography features of irregularity of appendiceal lumen (sensitivity = 84.2%) and loss of wall stratification (sensitivity = 96.5%), showed a combined sensitivity of more than 99%, which were determined to be the most sensitive parameters for clinicoradiological diagnosis of chronic appendicitis. Conclusion: Chronic appendicitis has often been misdiagnosed due to atypical symptoms at the time of presentation. Radiological investigations are used in the evaluation of patients with a high degree of clinical suspicion. This article has demonstrated the superiority of ultrasonography over CT scan for imaging of chronic appendicitis due to its advantages such as similar efficacy rates, higher spatial resolution in identifying features of chronic appendicitis, lack of ionizing radiation, cost-effectiveness, and easy availability. However, a definitive diagnosis is achieved by demonstrating evidence of chronic inflammation in the appendectomy specimen at histopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.