ArticleJournal of medical ultrasound
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Sonographic Scoring System in Predicting the Malignant Potential of a Soft-tissue Swelling.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Soft-tissue masses usually present as painless palpable lumps. Although histopathologic examination (HPE) is diagnostic, ultrasonography (USG), being cost-effective, is the preferred screening modality. However, as it is operator dependent, the diagnostic accuracy might be affected. Thus, this study was planned to determine the diagnostic accuracy of USG with Doppler in identifying the malignant nature of soft-tissue swellings and also to develop a scoring system with a valid cutoff to help differentiate malignant lesions from the benign ones. Methods: This analytical study with longitudinal design was conducted from July 2022 to June 2024 on patients with soft-tissue swelling selected by systematic random sampling. Data were collected by face-to-face interview, USG with Doppler, and histopathological examination. Data were presented with the help of descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: USG had 83.3% sensitivity, 89.5% specificity, 71.4% positive predictive value, 94.4% negative predictive value, and 88.0% accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant soft-tissue swelling. The interrater reliability between USG and HPE indicated "substantial agreement" (Cohen's Kappa 0.689, Conclusion: USG with Doppler can accurately differentiate between benign and malignant soft-tissue swelling. USG with Doppler-based scoring system could increase the sensitivity and specificity of this imaging modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.