ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Research progress on multidimensional intervention strategies for hyperuricemia: Western medicine, Traditional Chinese Medicine, and emerging therapies.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An evidence mapping study based on systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine for hyperuricemia.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Gouty kidney disease: a tubulointerstitial paradigm reimagined-early detection, precision stratification, and targeted intervention.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
- Multi-Targeted Intervention ofMetabolites · 2026Review
- Polyphenol-Rich Extract fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances in post-translational and epigenetic modification of hyperuricemia-to-gout progression: mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperuricemia is a metabolic disease caused by purine metabolism disorders. In recent years, its incidence has been increasing year by year and showing a trend of rejuvenation. It is closely associated with various health issues such as gout, kidney damage, and cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, standardizing and updating its treatment strategies holds significant clinical importance. This article systematically reviews the current various intervention methods and research status for the treatment of hyperuricemia: In the field of Western medicine, it deeply analyzes the efficacy, mechanism of action, and clinical limitations of drugs that promote uric acid excretion (such as benzbromarone and dotinurad), drugs that inhibit uric acid synthesis (such as allopurinol, febuxostat, and topiroxostat), and drugs that promote uric acid hydrolysis (such as pegloticase and rasburicase). It focuses on elaborating the research breakthroughs of URAT1 inhibitor derivatives and the new drug SHR4640. In the field of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), from three aspects of single-herb monomers, compound prescriptions, and external treatment methods, it reveals their advantages in reducing uric acid through multiple mechanisms, including inhibiting xanthine oxidase (XOD), regulating uric acid transporters such as URAT1, GLUT9, and OATs, and improving intestinal homeostasis, with particular emphasis on the structure-activity relationship of flavonoids. At the same time, it details the action pathways and clinical evidence of emerging therapies such as SGLT2 inhibitors, the GLP-1/GCG dual-receptor agonist Mazdutide, probiotics, and washed microbiota transplantation (WMT). By summarizing mechanistic insights, clinical progress, and translational prospects, this review aims to inform the development of individualized and integrative therapeutic strategies for hyperuricemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.