ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Deep eutectic solvent-based nanofluid in vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction of two antibiotics in milk: Application of the method in evaluating the effects of ultraviolet and microwave radiation, as well as sonication on antibiotic decontamination.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new eco-friendly and efficient nanofluid based vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction approach was developed for extracting of two antibiotics in milk samples. Eight new nanofluids were prepared utilizing graphene oxide aerogel as the nanoparticle and deep eutectic solvents. An appropriate amount of zinc sulfate was added to the milk sample. Then, 50 μL of the nanofluid was added to the deproteinized and diluted sample solution. The mixture was vortexed and the cloudy solution obtained was centrifuged. After back extraction, the analytes were analyzed by the determination system. The proposed method showed linear calibration range of 2.73-200 ng/mL with a good correlation coefficient of ≥0.9955. Limits of detection and quantitation were found to be 0.745 and 0.820 ng/mL and 2.48 and 2.73 ng/mL, for oxytetracycline and ciprofloxacin, respectively. The relative standard deviations were ≤ 14.30 %. All results were statistically evaluated and a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.