ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Angled manual traction and usual care for cervical radiculopathy: rationale and a protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial (pAMTLER).
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Awake closed manual reduction of cervical spine dislocation as an emergency bridge to surgery: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Angled manual traction (AMT) is widely used for relieving moderate-to-severe cervicobrachial pain in patients with cervical radiculopathy (CR), yet its effectiveness has yet to be established by rigorous full randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We have designed an external pilot to evaluate the feasibility of a future large-scale, definitive RCT on AMT for CR. Methods: 48 CR participants with cervicobrachial pain (numeric rating scale ≥ 4) will be enrolled in a five-period pilot RCT and randomly assigned to receive either usual care alone or AMT plus usual care for 4 consecutive periods (each period defined as 7 days). The primary outcome will be feasibility, focusing on enrolment rate, retention rate, and protocol adherence. The secondary outcomes include pain in the cervicobrachial region, upper extremity numbness, muscle weakness, upper extremity and neck function, analgesic consumption (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opiates), work ability, quality of life, emotional well-being prior to administering treatment at each period's initial visit, as well as safety and intervention costs during the trial. We employ linear mixed-effect models on the efficacy-related outcome measures to assess the changes within and between groups over time, and determine the statistical trends of effectiveness. Results: We expect the trial to be completed by June 2026, with successful pilot targets defined as achieving ≥ 25% enrolment, ≥80% adherence, ≥80% retention, and superior health outcomes in the AMT add-on arm compared with usual care. Conclusion: This external pilot trial will provide robust data on feasibility and outcome variability for power calculations in the proposed future confirmatory RCT on AMT for CR. This pilot RCT will be invaluable to the design and management of the subsequent full-scale RCT. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR): https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=236348 ChiCTR2400087289.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.