ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Integrating large language models into clinical pharmacy education: applications in perioperative medication management for gastric cancer.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the performance of ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1 in perioperative medication therapy management for gastric cancer, assessing their reliability and practicality as auxiliary tools in clinical pharmacy education. Methods: This study utilized a retrospective design to collate issues pertaining to perioperative medication management in gastric cancer, from which a standardized question set was developed. The set was concurrently submitted to both ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1 to generate model responses. Two independent assessors, blinded to the model sources, evaluated the outputs according to a predefined framework covering three core domains: (1) Clinical applicability, assessed via a 7-point Likert scale; (2) Information quality, evaluated using the DISCERN instrument for evidence reliability and content completeness; and (3) Readability, measured through the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and the SMOG Index. Results: In the 24-item evaluation of perioperative drug therapy for gastric cancer, both models exhibited high inter-rater reliability, with Cronbach's Conclusion: Both ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1 have demonstrated potential in addressing issues related to perioperative medication management for gastric cancer, with their generated responses showing good practical Applicability and readability suitable for the clinical pharmacy professional community. However, it should be noted that the quality of information provided by both models does not currently meet professional standards for drug therapy management. Therefore, they can be utilized as auxiliary tools for training the analytical skills of undergraduate students in clinical pharmacy, but their use should be guided by mentors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.