Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41488080›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Improving image-retrieval performance of foundation models in gastrointestinal endoscopic images.

Kangsan Kim, Junseok Park, Sang Hyun Kim, Youngbae Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kangsan Kim *Department of Intelligent Systems and Robotics, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Junseok Park *Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Hyun KimDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Youngbae HwangDepartment of Intelligent Systems and Robotics, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The quality of gastrointestinal endoscopy is verified by documenting specific required images, but identifying these images from the numerous photographs captured during a procedure is tedious. Conventional deep-learning approaches that aim to automate this process are often limited by subjective assessments and poor interpretability. Methods: We introduce a novel content-based image-retrieval framework that employs a dual-backbone architecture, integrating a general-purpose vision foundation model (DINOv2) and a domain-specific endoscopic model (GastroNet). The system is trained using parameter-efficient metric learning to generate discriminative embeddings for efficient similarity searches. The framework is evaluated on 3,500 public endoscopic images (from the Kvasir and HyperKvasir datasets) and validated on entirely unseen real-world and synthetic data. Results: Our model achieves state-of-the-art performance (97.71% Recall@1, 99.14% Recall@5, and 96.74% mean average precision), which is significantly superior to those of single-backbone baseline models. Ablation studies confirm that this improvement is primarily due to the two backbones capturing complementary features. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that the proposed dual-backbone framework offers an accurate and automated tool for assessing the procedural quality of gastrointestinal endoscopy and may facilitate more reliable quality control in clinical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningfoundation modelgastrointestinal endoscopeimage retrieval

Identifiers

PMID41488080
PMCPMC12756140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.