ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Explainable AI for suicide risk detection: gender- and age-specific patterns from real-time crisis chats.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suicide remains a leading cause of death worldwide, yet conventional risk models based on static demographic or diagnostic factors show limited predictive value. Advances in explainable artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) offer new opportunities for real-time, personalized risk detection. Methods: We analyzed 17,564 chat sessions (2017-2021) from Sahar, a digital crisis helpline. Suicide risk (SR) was defined by explicit suicidal ideation. A theory-driven lexicon of 20 psychological constructs (e.g., hopelessness, loneliness, self-harm), derived from leading SR frameworks, was applied using NLP. Logistic regression models estimated associations between constructs and SR, stratified by gender and age (10-17, 18-20, 21-40, and 41+). Temporal trajectories of predictors were examined across five conversation stages. Results: Previous suicide attempts and hopelessness were the strongest predictors across all groups. Gender differences emerged: among women, loneliness was a consistent predictor, whereas in men, thwarted belongingness and late-session depression were more salient. Age analyses showed developmental specificity: prior attempts were strongest in adolescents, hopelessness and self-harm peaked in young adults, thwarted belongingness strengthened with age, and loneliness predicted risk only among adults aged 41+. Several factors, including bullying/cyberbullying, LGBTQ identity, and perfectionism, were inversely associated with SR in specific subgroups. Conclusions: This study demonstrates how explainable, theory-informed NLP can capture dynamic SR factors in real-world crisis interactions. Findings reveal distinct gender- and age-specific pathways, underscoring the need for personalized prevention strategies. Beyond theoretical insights, the approach highlights the potential of AI-driven, interpretable monitoring tools to support crisis counselors in detecting escalating risk earlier and tailoring interventions. Such methods can enhance the accuracy, timeliness, and equity of suicide prevention, and illustrate how explainable AI can translate psychological theory into clinically meaningful tools for mental health screening and early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.