ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Considerations for Glaucoma Evaluation and Management in Refractive Surgery Candidates.
Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The popularity of refractive surgery has grown significantly in recent years, yet concerns about its effects on glaucoma evaluation and progression remain unclear. Various techniques in both corneal and lens-based refractive surgery have been developed, necessitating different strategies for monitoring glaucoma. With the advent of advanced technologies and instruments, our ability to detect and monitor glaucoma in patients undergoing refractive surgery has improved. This review provides comprehensive information on glaucoma risk assessment and monitoring from preoperative to postoperative stages for different types of refractive surgery, highlighting key considerations at each stage of care. We aim to raise awareness and confidence among refractive surgeons handling cases involving glaucoma suspects or patients with glaucoma at any stage of refractive surgery. Based on updated evidence, we provide key recommendations that include conducting a comprehensive glaucoma risk assessment, ensuring vigilant monitoring of high-risk cases, and selecting the most suitable tonometer for precise intraocular pressure measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.