ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Severe Immune-related Adverse Events and Their Effect on Survival in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-treatment inflammatory markers can identify the risk of immune-related toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Integrated cellular, proteomic and metabolomic profiling of immune-related adverse events in non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become central in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is a critical issue in the management of patients with NSCLC receiving ICIs. Recent studies have suggested that patients who develop irAEs may have a better prognosis than those who do not. However, the most problematic cases involved the development of severe irAEs. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of severe irAEs (grade ≥3) in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs. Patients and Methods: We analyzed 122 patients from a prospective database of consecutive patients with NSCLC who received first-line ICI-containing treatment between November 2018 and October 2024. Patients were classified into two groups: 48 treated with anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) therapy and 74 treated with anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) therapy. We retrospectively compared the incidence of severe irAEs between the two groups and evaluated the clinical outcomes of severe irAEs on the survival. Results: Among 122 patients, 24 (19.7%) experienced severe irAEs. The incidence of severe irAEs was significantly higher among patients treated with anti-PD-1 than among those treated with anti-PD-L1. The incidence of irAE-related death was also higher in the anti-PD-1 group than in the anti-PD-L1 group, with pneumonitis accounting for most of these fatalities (87.5%). There were no significant differences in the progression-free or overall survival between patients with and without severe irAEs. A multivariable analysis showed that the use of anti-PD-1 therapy was associated with a worse overall survival. Conclusion: Treatment with anti-PD-1 was associated with an increased risk of severe irAEs. The incidence of severe irAEs was not associated with an improved survival rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.