Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487921›Full record

ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis

Surgical Outcomes and Diagnostic Concordance in Patients With Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Undergoing Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Atsushi Nanashima, Masahide Hiyoshi, Naoya Imamura, Yuki Tsuchimochi, Takashi Wada, Takeomi Hamada, Yasuto Suzuki, Yuusuke Araki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Atsushi NanashimaDivision of Hepato-biliary-pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery,University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Masahide HiyoshiDivision of Hepato-biliary-pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery,University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Naoya ImamuraDivision of Hepato-biliary-pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery,University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Yuki TsuchimochiDivision of Hepato-biliary-pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery,University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Takashi WadaDivision of Hepato-biliary-pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery,University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Takeomi HamadaDivision of Hepato-biliary-pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery,University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Yasuto SuzukiDivision of Hepato-biliary-pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery,University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Yuusuke ArakiDivision of Hepato-biliary-pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery,University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aim: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are heterogeneous neoplasms for which surgical resection remains the only potentially curative therapy. However, preoperative diagnostic accuracy - particularly tumor grading - often varies, complicating treatment decisions. This study evaluated diagnostic concordance between preoperative assessments and postoperative pathology, as well as surgical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients undergoing pancreatectomy for PanNETs. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 32 patients who underwent surgical resection for PanNETs. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical procedures, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Preoperative imaging and cytology-based diagnoses were compared with final pathological findings to evaluate diagnostic concordance. Prognostic factors were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: Histological grading of resected specimens showed G1 in 53%, G2 in 41%, and G3/NEC in 6%, with a 38% discordance rate from preoperative biopsy. Lymphatic, venous, and perineural invasions were identified in 16%, 44%, and 13% of cases. Lymph node metastasis occurred in 22%. Among 30 patients with follow-up >12 months, eight developed recurrence, most commonly in the liver. The 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 78% and 69%, while overall survival (OS) rates were 96% and 91%. Tumor number >2 and histologic grade G3 were significantly associated with reduced DFS ( Conclusion: Pancreatectomy for PanNETs is a safe and effective treatment with favorable long-term outcomes. Histological factors such as tumor grade, lymphatic invasion, and tumor number significantly predict recurrence and survival.

Indexed as

diagnostic concordancepancreatectomyPancreatic neuroendocrine tumorprognostic factorssurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41487921
PMCPMC12758650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.