ArticleCureus2025
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Dengue, Vector Control, and Vaccine Acceptance Among the Mexican Population.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Dengue is a growing public health problem. Prevention strategies need to consider the population's attitudes, practices, and knowledge about the disease, including its transmission and preventive measures. This study aims to analyze the results of the cross-sectional GEMKAP (Growth & Emerging Markets, Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices) survey among the Mexican population and make recommendations for improvement. Methods A subset study of the GEMKAP survey was carried out, considering only Mexican participants. A total of 600 participants aged between 18 and 60 years were included. A web-based survey was administered from September to October 2022, with descriptive statistics applied for analysis. Results Six hundred people were evaluated; 55% were women, 39% were young adults, and 71% had at least a high school education. The scores obtained were: knowledge 48%, attitudes 68%, practices 42%, capability 55%, opportunity 61%, and motivation 58%. Knowledge regarding the vector varied; only 37% knew the four types of dengue virus, 18% were informed that co-infection with two or more types of the virus was possible, and 93% knew that dengue could be fatal. The majority (97%) reported implementing preventive measures for dengue. Confidence in vaccination was high (79%). The majority (80%) believed that the dengue vaccine should be available for everyone. Twenty-four percent would not get the vaccine if they had to pay for it, and 65% would get it to prevent dengue if a medical professional recommends it. The main concerns were the level of vaccine protection (46%) and safety (44%). Conclusions KAP studies provide valuable information obtained directly from the population affected by dengue. This data can help to improve dengue prevention and management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.