Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487878›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Narrative Review.

Ahmed Mohamed, Usman Fuad, Usama Farook, Ahmed Nagi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed MohamedTrauma and Orthopedics, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, GBR.
Usman FuadTrauma and Orthopedics, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, GBR.
Usama FarookTrauma and Orthopedics, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, GBR.
Ahmed NagiTrauma and Orthopedics, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proximal humerus fractures represent a significant healthcare burden in the elderly population. These injuries are the third most common fragility fractures, after hip and distal radius fractures. The management of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients is controversial. Treatment options range from conservative management to surgical interventions. The choice depends on multiple factors, including fracture pattern, bone quality, patient functional demands, and comorbidities. This narrative review examines the current evidence regarding both conservative and operative management strategies for proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. We discuss the classification systems, treatment algorithms, outcomes, and complications. The goal of this review is to provide clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of management options to optimize patient outcomes.

Indexed as

conservative managementelderly patientsopen reduction internal fixationprofher trialproximal humerus fracturesreverse shoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41487878
PMCPMC12756843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.