Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487873›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Impact of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Endometrial Pathology: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Hiba Al Azeez, Mena Abdalla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hiba Al AzeezObstetrics and Gynaecology, Princess Royal University Hospital, London, GBR.
Mena AbdallaMedical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is widely used for managing menopausal symptoms; however, its impact on the endometrium continues to be a clinically significant concern. This study aimed to investigate the association between HRT use and endometrial pathology in women presenting with various gynaecological symptoms. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted involving a cohort of 62 patients who underwent hysteroscopy at the Princess Royal University Hospital. Data on patient demographics, clinical presentation, HRT use, and histological findings were collected and analyzed. Statistical analysis, including chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests, was performed using Python with SPSS-style methodology to assess the relationships between variables. Results The mean age of the cohort was 52.7 ± 9.3 years. Of the 62 patients, 13 (21.0%) were on HRT, 11 (17.7%) were not on HRT, and 38 (61.3%) had an unknown HRT status. A statistically significant association was found between HRT status and histological outcomes (χ² = 22.0985, p = 0.0364). Significant associations were also observed between age group and HRT use (χ² = 14.6001, p = 0.0236) and between clinical presentation and HRT use (χ² = 18.1885, p = 0.0058). No significant difference was found in age (p = 0.2340) or endometrial thickness (p = 0.8776) between HRT users and non-users. Conclusion This study demonstrates a significant association between HRT use and endometrial pathology. The findings highlight the importance of endometrial surveillance in women on HRT. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings and to elucidate the long-term effects of different HRT regimens on the endometrium.

Indexed as

diagnostic hysteroscopyendometrial pathologyendometrial thickness (et)hormone replacement therapy (hrt)postmenopausal bleeding

Identifiers

PMID41487873
PMCPMC12759106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.